Sunday, May 9, 2010
Is relocation of Penang Port the right call?
Northport expects further volume increase
Northport (Malaysia) Bhd, which recorded a 26% jump in volume for the first quarter of this year against the same period last year, is positive of a further uptrend in its business.
For the first three months of this year, Northport’s volume hit 779, 867 twenty-foot equivalents (TEUs).
Northport managing director Datuk Basheer Hassan Abdul Kader said the port recorded a 30% growth in transhipment containers, which reflected a strong resurgence in regional economies.
“We are confident of a sustainable growth in container volume at Northport, based on a positive forecast of the country’s economy and also on recovery trends in the shipping market,” he said in a statement.
Basheer added that recent developments in the fleet deployment of shipping lines – which included restoration of suspended services, injection of additional ships and changes in their service strings – mirrored the renewed confidence in the shipping markets.
“Based on these demands, Northport aims to chart a cargo volume increase of between 10% and 15% for this year against that of last year.
“The positive forecast is also applicable to our non-containerised cargo business that recorded a 40% growth in the first quarter of this year compared with a year ago,” he said.
Source: StarBiz
Thursday, May 6, 2010
MISC’s pre-tax profit down 40pc to RM933m
MISC Bhd announced a 40 per cent lower pre-tax profit of RM933.1 million for the financial year ended March 31, 2010 compared with a pre-tax profit of RM1.556 billion last year.
The reduction in profits was mainly due to higher losses in the liner and chemical businesses and reduced profits in the petroleum segment, MISC said in a statement today.
Revenue was at RM13.775 billion against a revenue of RM15.783 billion in the previous financial year.
MISC also said the rights issue exercise completed in February, with the issuance of 744.0 million new shares, has led to a drop in net tangible asset (NTA) per share from RM5.54 at the end of the previous financial year to RM5.17 as at March 31, 2010.
Meanwhile, the higher group cash balances from the rights issue proceeds have led to a reduction in net debt equity ratio to 0.2:1 during the year reviewed compared with 0.38:1 the previous year.
MISC has recommended a final dividend of 20 sen per share tax exempt.
The company said it expected better performance ahead with the containment of losses of its liner business.
Additionally, expansion of its heavy engineering business and its offshore business are expected to contribute positively to the group’s performance.
Source: Malaysian Insider
Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Sabah re-ignites cabotage policy row
Monday, May 3, 2010
Europe’s shipbuilders may break out of the doldrums before Asia’s
FOR those who regard the smashing of a champagne bottle as a tragic waste, the problems facing the world’s shipbuilders are excellent news. It takes such a long time to construct huge ocean-going container ships, bulk carriers and oil tankers that the vast shipyards of South Korea, China and Japan will still be cracking bottles of bubbly over newly launched ships for a couple of years yet. But once these vessels, ordered in the boom before the financial crisis, are in the water, the course ahead looks rocky. Oddly, Europe’s shipyards, although still storm-lashed after 30 years of low-cost competition from Asia, seem to face a slightly brighter horizon.
Fresh orders for the world’s shipyards are at a low ebb. Last year they were more than 80% lower than in 2007, when sky-high freight rates and cheery economic forecasts encouraged shipping companies to scramble for new vessels. The subsequent recession in the rich world sent shipping rates tumbling. A swift rebound is unlikely: despite more scrapping and some cancellations, hundreds of ships are poised to hit the oceans this year.
Asia’s shipyards, streamlined and efficient, concentrate on building large, standardised ships. These are the sort in greatest oversupply. South Korea’s shipyards won over half of global orders for new ships in the first quarter of 2010, but they were worth just $2.2 billion. In 2008 Korean yards won orders worth $32 billion. Hyundai Heavy Industries, one of four big Korean shipbuilders, has not won a single order for a ship since late 2008.
European shipbuilders are suffering from a dearth of new orders too. The Odense shipyard owned by A.P. Moller-Maersk, one of the world’s biggest shippers, has an illustrious history: it produced the world’s biggest container ship. But cheap Asian competition for this type of vessel has holed it below the waterline. It will close in 2012.
Europe’s shipmakers are turning to national governments and the European Union for help, claiming that their industry is close to collapse. In early April representatives from nine EU countries called for an emergency programme to support the industry. Shipyards want help in gaining access to credit lines and soft loans, as well as rules to promote greener ships. This would support them until shipping finance recovers and hesitant customers regain faith in the world economy.
Yet the restructuring forced by low-cost Asian competitors has left Europe’s shipyards with some advantages. Their revenues of €30 billion-40 billion ($40 billion-53 billion) a year come mainly from niche markets which are not suffering from as much overcapacity as the mainstream.
Cruise ships are a particular speciality, and the market is growing. Four orders have been placed with European yards this year, compared with one in 2009. Ferries, another area of European dominance, are also in demand, and ageing ferry fleets in the Mediterranean are due for replacement soon. The offshore wind farms sprouting around the continent provide another opportunity. Europe’s shipmakers are adept at designing cable-laying ships and other service vessels. And as oil firms are forced to drill in ever deeper waters, ships suited to the task of towing and maintaining new rigs will be needed.
Pressure to make ships greener will also favour European shipyards. The International Maritime Organisation is discussing regulations that may force ships to belch out less carbon dioxide, and has introduced tighter limits on other pollutants. Europe leads in this type of technology, too. European shipmakers will also benefit from plans to encourage greater use of the continent’s inland waterways to ship goods instead of hauling them by road. If they can weather the current storm, Europe’s shipyards may yet resound again to the smashing of bottles.
Source: Economist
Monday, April 26, 2010
Twists and turns at Malaysian Merchant Marine Bhd
SHIPPING company Malaysian Merchant Marine Bhd (MMM) came to life in 1993, and was first introduced to the investing public when it was listed on the second board of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange in 1997.
The company was doing fairly well, and during the oil and gas boom in 2003, MMM was the darling of Bursa Malaysia, with many analysts forecasting stellar earnings from the company’s expansion plans.
Things however took a turn for the worse about a year later when the company’s long-term charter strategy caused it to miss out on the bull run in shipping rates. Long dry-docking costs also ate into margins.
In came Datuk Ramesh Rajaratnam as a substantial shareholder of MMM in December 2007, after he acquired 28.7%, or 50.4 million shares, and 470,000 Islamic preference shares from MMM’s substantial shareholder, oil and gas outfit M3nergy Bhd for some RM33.5mil.
M3nergy today still holds 20.9 million shares, or 11.9% of MMM.
Ramesh’s emergence in MMM as deputy executive chairman came with bold plans.
He had said in past interviews that he wanted to emulate Datuk Tony Fernandes, achieving in the shipping industry what Fernandes has done with AirAsia Bhd.
It’s now been two years, and it appears that those plans are nothing but pipe dreams. The company is today a financially distressed company, having fallen into the Practice Note 17 category in March this year.
For the nine months ended December last year, MMM’s net loss widened to RM17.3mil from RM4.5mil a year earlier on the back of RM29.7mil in revenue against RM76mil previously.
Malaysian Rating Agency Bhd (MARC) has been continuously downgrading MMM’s bonds from its A rating since Dec 19, 2009.
On April 2, MARC downgraded its rating on MMM’s RM120mil Al Bai’ Bithaman Ajil Islamic Debt Securities (BaIDS) to a D rating from a C rating.
This was due to MMM’s failure to meet a repayment of the BaIDS on March 29. MMM announced its default in payment on March 30.
What went wrong?
When Ramesh came in December 2007, MMM had a number of sea going vessels and although it had a very heavy debt position, it also had a strong cash balance.
Ramesh came in and streamlined the group’s operations by disposing non-core businesses and vessels that were either too old or those that appeared not to fit into its strategy “I attempted to go for a capital reduction exercise to clean up our balance sheet but that was voted down by the shareholders,” he said.
For a while, these strategies appeared to work and for the financial period ended 31 March 2009, MMM had returned to the black after several years of significant losses.
Then came the crash of the shipping sector in 2008. The Baltic Dry Index fell from about 12,000 points in late 2007 to about 700 points by May 2008. Suddenly, the demand for vessels worldwide dried up and the charter rates began to fall alarmingly.
That year, the company also sold its Mauritius-based charter brokering business MMM Ventures Ltd for US$4mil (RM13.25mil).
“Our vessels that were fully employed at about US$5,000 a day, were suddenly having off-hire days. When a vessel is off hire, the daily running cost of about US$3,500 was still being incurred. That’s RM10,000 per day per vessel,” he explained.
MMM’s single hull vessels that it had earmarked for sale were suddenly no longer in demand as similar capacity double-hull tankers were being offered at lower prices by many distressed sellers.
“It was not unusual to hear of vessels that were newly built at a cost of say, US$20mil, that were being sold off by the building yards at US$10mil to recover cash,” he said.
At that time, Ramesh’s strategy was to sell off its ageing fleet (vessels that were above 15 years) and with the monies raised, to buy a newer fleet.
However, with the world recession, MMM had no buyers for the old vessels and no funders for the new vessels. Hence, MMM chose to cancel or renege on those new buildings and suffer the deposit loss, which was a fraction of the real loss in write down value.
Said Ramesh: “When MARC downgraded us from A- to BB, all our funding efforts were severely scuppered. A local bank that had offered us US$ 77mil in funding for new vessels ordered, retracted that offer at the last minute. That was a period when the funding market worldwide was just too spooked to move,”
Ramesh said that MMM’s vessel suppliers were becoming more restrained in their credit policy and all these factors. Some of MMM’s customers also defaulted on their payments as they too were faced with similar challenges.
“This becames a time when ship-owners who had deep pockets could last out the storm. The smaller ones, had to consider abandoning ship or sink with it. MMM was not an exception to these challenges. In my capacity as an interested party, I was selling my shares and assets to finance the company through these tough times. At some point, I had to stop doing this,” he said.
Ramesh said he has been funding the company until a week ago, when he finally stopped.
“It is disappointing but as I’ve said earlier, the choice is to jump ship now or sink with it. Difficult choices are being made daily now,” he said.
Mistakes made
Currently, the only revenue generating asset of the company is the MMM Ashton, a double-hull vessel which is currently deployed under a bareboat charter contract.
MMM Ashton is targeted for disposal by May 2010 in order to meet MMM’s debt commitment. The net realisable value of the vessel, initially estimated at around US$11mil has now been revalued to US$5mil for the final RM24mil payment in BaIDS.
MMM has total debt obligations of some RM64mil.
The company’s other two ships are MMM Kingston and MMM Dayton, which have been put up for sale and have been written down to a cost of some US$50,000.
There have been various criticism on the company’s moves.
Questions have been raised as to why the profitable MMM Ventures was sold for only US$4mil, when its three vessels were being chartered out for some US13,000 per day.
There are also rumblings that all the ambitious plans were mere talk. While there were plans to acquire new vessels, none actually went through.
“MMM entered into a contract to buy a ship for US$40mil in December 2008. That never happened and MMM lost its deposit of US$4mil,” said an observer.
Furthermore, for the quarter of March 31, 2009, when MMM turned back to the black, there were no comparative figures available. This was because the group had changed its financial year from Aug 31 to March 31. The financial period was from Sept 1, 2007 to March 31, 2009, which was a 19 month period. Thus there were no applicable figures.
The observer added that he found it hard to believe that the two vessels, MMM Dayton and MMM Kingston had been written down to US$50,000. “Based on its weightage and specifications, it should be worth US$400,000 and US$600,000 respectively.”
Source: StarBiz
Thursday, April 22, 2010
Northport sees 26pc Q1 container growth
Containers handled rose to 779,867 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) for the first three months compared with 620,633 TEUs in the same period last year.
The increase in the volume of containers handled was one of the strongest in recent years and exceeded all expectations considering that the container traffic fell marginally by two per cent last year on account of the global economic slowdown, Northport said in a statement today.
Based on the demand-side developments, cargo volumes at Northport could increase between 10 and 15 per cent in 2010 compared with the volume of containers handled in 2009, said managing director Datuk Basheer Hassan Abdul Kader.
The port recorded strong revival in trade as the handling of export and import containers rose impressively, suggesting robust recovery of the national economy after it contracted by 1.9 per cent last year.
In line with the improving economic and trading environment and boosted by the growth of the country''s manufacturing sector, container exports via Northport rose by 25 per cent to 223,450 TEUs while imports rose by 21 per cent totalling 231,450 TEUs during the January-March period this year.
"It was particularly gratifying to note that we recorded very high growth in the volume of transshipment containers, which rose by a substantial 30 per from 250,782 TEUs to 324,899 TEUs, reflecting a strong resurgence in the growth of regional economies," said Basheer.
He said while Northport has been largely a major sea outlet handling the national trade and its growth largely reflecting the intensity of the economic activities in the immediate catchment areas, the surge in transshipment volume was noteworthy as it served to strengthen the confidence of global shipping lines.
"We are handling more than 120 shipping lines, including a good spread of feeder network linking Northport with more than 250 ports worldwide and this has added the attraction of Northport as a transshipment hub to shipping lines," he said.
Basheer said the increase in transshipment was a positive reflection on the port's high level of service to discerning global shipping lines to win more transshipment, notwithstanding the fact that transshipment traffic has become very competitive in the regional as well as the national port systems.
"We offer a very competitive level of service based on high productivity, consistency and efficiency because we are very focused on optimising on asset utilisation which gives us the edge and the shipping lines good value for money," he said.
"We are confident that the growth in container volumes at Northport will be sustained especially on account of the positive prognosis and forecast on the performance of the Malaysian economy and also based on recent trends in the recovery of the shipping markets," he added.
Council to coordinate management of country's ports to be formed
Transport Minister Datuk Seri Ong Tee Keat said further details on the matter would be announced later and that the setting up of the council, to be chaired by him, would not jeopardise the functions of existing port authorities.
"The cabinet and the National Economic Council have approved the formation of the National Port Council to coordinate matters pertaining to management of ports to further promote them at international level to attract more clients," he added.
Ong was speaking to reporters after the award-giving ceremony for excellent achievements in the world standings of top container ports of the world near here Thursday.
At the function, the country's two leading ports, Port Klang and the Port of Tanjung Pelepas (PTP) were honoured for being in the list of the world's best 20 ports last year.
Source: The Star
Monday, March 29, 2010
Northport Expects Cargo Volume To Increase 10-15 Per Cent
Sunday, March 21, 2010
Century Logistics charts growth strategy
Source: Business Times
Sunday, March 14, 2010
Maersk aims to sail into 'modest' profit
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Tg Agas industrial park infrastructure on track
Friday, March 5, 2010
Trade eyes alternate routes, oil buffers over Malacca risk
Oil traders are concerned about supply disruptions via the Malacca Strait after the Singapore Navy warned of possible attacks on tankers, but said alternate routes could be used that add slightly to costs while stocks on landed and floating storages offer ample buffer.
However, they cautioned that the more than 30 tankers crowding the waters off Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia used as storage tanks for distillates, fuel oil and crude could also be targets.
Malaysia and Indonesia are bolstering security in the Strait of Malacca, through which flows at least 15 million barrels of oil each day, while Singapore also raised alert levels and beefed up security at its airport and new casino resorts after the navy’s warning.
“Of course, we are concerned. But there’s nothing more that we can do on our part as the cargo owners to prevent this from happening,” a senior Singapore-based Asian trader said today.
“The alternatives are easy enough. The diversion around Indonesia adds two to three days to sailing time and costs a little bit more, but that’s OK.”
The trader said in the event of an attack on a tanker, the loss of a single cargo might be a problem for the owner, “but it’s an opportunity for everyone else to sell at higher prices”.
If the strait was blocked after an attack, tankers could sail further south along the western coast of Indonesia’s Sumatra via the Sunda Strait and head north to Singapore, adding two to three days of sailing time. Ships moving to North Asia could sail towards East Java via the Lombok Strait or Banda Strait.
For example, this would add US$20,000-US$30,000 (RM68,000-RM102,000) per day to the cost of carrying diesel or kerosene on an 80,000-tonne tanker.
Traders said the loss of a single cargo, even if it was on board a Very Large Crude Carrier (VLCC), would have minimal impact on the market’s demand-supply dynamics because for distillates alone, some 14 million barrels were being stored on tankers in international waters around Southeast Asia.
“It could be disruptive to oil trades, but it would be not catastrophic,” said David Kirsch, PFC Energy’s Director of Market Intelligence Service.
“It would also raise insurance rates, but typically the price of oil rises in conjunction with these insurance rates, so the impact is on the consumers, not the transit trade.”
Shipping and industry groups have advised shippers to take extra care when passing through the Malacca Strait and have increased vigilance on their vessels.
Traders also said there were about 4 million to 5 million tonnes of fuel oil and crude on board converted VLCCs anchored off Malaysia’s southern ports of Tanjong Pelepas and Pasir Gudang.
While these provide a comfortable cushion to the market if an attack triggers serious disruptions, they also face risks.
“They are as vulnerable as any tanker sailing along the Strait. But maybe less of a risk, because they are in closer proximity with each other and help can be rendered more readily,” said a trader, who has cargoes on floating storages.
“Also, it’s probably less dangerous because fuel oil and distillates are less flammable. But I don’t think these crazy guys are going to have the intelligence to check what’s on board before they decide to go after a ship.”
Carl Larry, president of Oil Outlooks and Opinions LLC said a global market struggling with oversupply would view disruptions such as a closing of the Malacca Strait or the refinery damage in Chile as supportive factors.
“As with Chile, the refined products that are in great oversupply are already water-borne and easy enough to move around the Strait,” he said, pointing to recent moves to send diesel to the quake-hit Latin American country, which have sent gas oil cracks to 11-month highs near US$10 a barrel.
“I think there is the shock and hype factor about the delay for ships to get through, but the supply that so many are desperately looking to move gets a chance to ease.”
Still, most traders welcomed the heightened security in the Strait, which has been plagued by piracy, adding that this would help deter attacks and ease their worries.
“I would expect the Strait to be very heavily patrolled, and the likelihood of any attack materialising is quite low — you have all that security on standby to prevent it from happening,” said a distillates trader with a European firm.
Source: Malaysian Insider
Thursday, March 4, 2010
Terror threat in Malacca, Singapore Straits
International Maritime Bureau piracy reporting centre head of Asian region Noel Chung said the organisation was alerted by a foreign agency to this threat and has passed on the alert to the relevant regional authorities in Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia.
He said that while threats of piracy were common in both straits, a terror threat against ships was new to the waters.
“This alert was not issued by us, so we cannot tell you what level or how serious the threat is,” he told The Star.
Chung advised ships plying both straits to be extra vigilant and conduct radar lookouts.
“Usually, ships keep a lookout after dark to thwart pirate attacks. We are advising them to keep a 24-hour watch,” he said.
International news agency AFP reported that an unidentified terrorist group is planning attacks against oil tankers in the Malacca Straits, one of the world’s busiest shipping lanes, quoting the Singapore Navy and a shipping association on Thursday.
The Singapore Shipping Association said it had received an advisory from the Singapore Navy Information Fusion Centre about “an indication that a terrorist group is planning attacks on oil tankers in the Malacca Straits.”
It said “this does not preclude possible attacks on other large vessels with dangerous cargo.”
“The terrorists’ intent is probably to achieve widespread publicity and showcase that it remains a viable group,” the Singapore Navy said in its advisory.
It reminded shipping operators that the militants could use smaller vessels such as dinghies and speedboats to attack oil tankers and urged them to take precautions.
Pirates and robbers have also used small fishing vessels to board ships during previous attacks in the Malacca Straits, it noted.
Security analysts have said that the Malacca Straits, bordered by Singapore, Malaysia and Indonesia, is a prime target because more than 30% of global trade and half the world’s oil shipments pass through the narrow waterway.
“If the Singapore Navy is providing this information, it should be taken very seriously,” said John Harrison, a maritime security expert at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies in Singapore.
He said that on the threat level scale, an “indication” is lower than a “warning”, but precautions should still be taken.
A “warning” refers to a credible threat that an attack is likely to be carried out against a target over a specific time frame, while an “indication” is gathered from a series of suspicious activities in a certain area.
“Certainly, we do know that there has been a long-term concern about terrorism in the Malacca Straits but the threat level remains fairly low,” Harrison told AFP.
“That said, it was very prudent for the Singapore Navy to pass this warning along because it keeps the threat level where it is.”
While the Singapore Navy did not name any group, Harrison said the South-East Asia-based Jemaah Islamiyah (JI) militant group or al-Qaeda itself could not be ruled out.
“JI could certainly be one of the groups. We have not seen any public evidence indicating they have the capability to operate but that does not mean they are not developing them,” he said.
In its advisory, the Singapore Navy recommended that ships should “strengthen their onboard security measures and to adopt community reporting to increase awareness and strengthen the safety of all seafarers,” according to the shipping association.
Singapore, one of Asia’s most affluent cities and a regional base for thousands of multinational companies, is a prime target for attacks by militant groups, officials have said.
One of the plots foiled by Singapore authorities was a plan by Islamic militants to hijack an airliner in Bangkok and crash it into Changi airport in 2001 following the September 11 attacks that year in the United States.
Singapore has also arrested several militants involved in a plot to bomb the US embassy and other targets in the city-state.
Source: The Star